Thread:Nerdfightergirl/@comment-36079671-20180711014448/@comment-36079671-20180713223541

Tooniee wrote: Either keep it respectful or you will be blocked. You're welcome to discuss things, but keep some perspective. It's a month of birth on a timeywimey show of which the writers/creator have stated not to care that much about the timeline.

As far as the discussion goes, there is just no right answer. The writers simply don't care at all about timelines, so using one character's age to derive another's creates a complicated entanglement of what is based on what, which leaves us with conflicting dates etc. and no idea which to believe. Also, monitors reflect date of filming more often than actual in-universe date. I attempted to have a discussion, even noted it was a continuity issue in the writing. I was merely pointing out that there are many details that contradict the May birth. You are correct, there is no exact answer; so I don't understand why other's emphatically insist they're more accurate than anyone else, and delete or revert any edits or additions made by fellow viewers. She took the fun out of coming together to solve the timeline puzzle.

Sidenote: Although I agree screens are often unreliable souces for dates and times when they're inadvertently caught on camera, there are instances when they are purposefully shown and help place the in-universe timeline.